It’s a strange position, being a software engineer for an interactive marketing agency at the dawn of augmented reality. I paid my initial dues in the traditional software and web markets, where the products I helped create were made to be the focus of the type of online campaigns that I now take part in developing. From an engineering standpoint, both worlds have their mannerisms (good and bad), but specifically with augmented reality and marketing there exists a peculiar situation that brands, looking to implement an emerging technology, would be wise to take into account.
I love the excitement over augmented reality. This is not to be confused with the hype over augmented reality, but the general feeling, among those that follow the tech, that we are entering a new chapter in human/computer interfaces. This feeling is spreading to brands who, having the right mindset about marketing, always want to show themselves as being on the cutting edge of new interactive user experiences. This is one of the good effects that the marketing world is having on AR, because the advertising dollars are funding research and development.
With the pro of major brand interest and funding, though, comes the con of many in the marketing world misunderstanding the technology, due to its hype and those riding it. Couple this with the fact that a large number of interactive agencies are selling AR (read: riding the hype), when in reality, only a handful of companies are actually producing the product. Rather than be any more didactic with this, I’ll break down the situation to a metaphor.
Imagine that you want a filet mignon. You’ve never had a filet mignon, and you have a general idea of what it actually is, but no idea how it’s made. Yet, you know that everyone is raving about it, so you decide to go out to a restaurant and get one.
The Production/Tech Company
You drive by a fast food place with a big sign that says “Home of the Original Filet Mignon.” Thinking that, if they have the “original” filet mignon, this should be the place to go, you step inside. No one greets you at the door and you have to walk up to the counter to order. You place your order for one filet mignon and the cook gets started. While this restaurant has the right steak in stock, they’re just a fast food place and have no knowledge of how to present it, so they just grind it up, grill it, and put it in a bun. If you didn’t know any better, you might think this was pretty good, but someone who had a filet mignon before would look at you with contempt if you said so.
This, from a marketing perspective, is what happens when a brand goes directly to a production/tech company for an AR execution. The brand has an AR product in the end, but it winds up completely lacking in presentation and preparation. It doesn’t tell a story, and therefore, doesn’t sell the product.
The Traditional Interactive Agency
You drive by one of the most popular restaurants in town. You’ve received good food there in the past, so you think that they might have good filet mignon as well. Stepping inside you’re taken to your seat by a pleasant hostess and handed your menus. You notice that filet mignon isn’t actually on the menu, but when the waiter comes, you ask him if they make it. He says, “of course we do. One filet mignon coming up!” What he didn’t tell you is they actually don’t make filet mignon, the restaurant down the street does. He runs down to the other restaurant, in a frenzy, to act as a middleman between you and their filet mignon. When you ask questions about how the steak is prepared, he doesn’t know and takes fifteen minutes to run down the street, get the answer and come back. Eventually he brings you a filet mignon, properly prepared, if not a little cold. Also, since his restaurant needs to make a profit, he jacked the price up twenty five percent.
So it goes with most interactive agencies, which have plenty of people on site to do traditional online campaigns, but not much R&D. Times are tough and they don’t want to lose your business, so often, even though they don’t have anyone on staff that fully understands the tech, they will sell a complete AR campaign to a brand. In many, if not most cases, the AR execution is either obsolete or, oppositely, pitched with functionality that won’t be technically possible for years.
The Interactive Agency specializing in Emerging Technology
You go to an online restaurant review site and get directed to the restaurant that, in the last example, actually made the filet mignon. Upon entering, you find that their hosting staff is just as pleasant as the other restaurant and that it functions on standard fine restaurant procedures. Filet mignon is on the menu and your waiter is knowledgeable in its preparation and presentation. If he isn’t sure about something, there’s no worry, because the chef is fifteen feet away. You receive a filet mignon exactly as it was meant to be at the price it should cost.
An interactive media agency specializing in emerging technology not only understands how to tell a brand’s story through successful, traditional online campaigns, but also has in-house staff that can create the cutting edge interactive experiences brands want to give to their customers. In the end, that means a more effective overall execution that actually sells the product.
Augmented reality is such a new technology that, when looking for an agency, it’s easy to separate the wheat from the chaff. Just ask detailed, project specific questions, from the beginning, to determine off hand knowledge. Most importantly, don’t trust agencies that say anything is technically possible. Some day we might be able to all have Terminator vision, but right now, we’re just playing with wooden blocks.
Metaphors aside, what I hope to get across is that, when it comes to augmented reality for marketing purposes, it pays to make the right friends.
I previously wrote about the ABC series Flash Forward’s interactive marketing efforts in a blog post entitled – A New ARG Or Standard Integrated Entertainment Marketing Campaign. I was wondering if Flash Forward would be a standard ARG or raise the bar for interactive storytelling. After watching the series premiere (which looks promising btw), I went back to see how Flash Forward’s online efforts have evolved. Needless to say, they have a good handle on how they want their fans to interact with the show online and have created a compelling experience using the latest emerging media and technology tactics. This is by far one of the best integrated marketing efforts I’ve seen in quite some time.
If you want the overarching strategy and insight into the campaign from ABC, you can view it at AdAge here. And I would also suggest checking out Liz Miller’s breakdown of the Flash Forward tactical executions over at NewTeeVee. The campaign utilizes some of the newer emerging media and technology components for Interactive Marketing including:
An Augmented Reality experience (which admittedly feels rushed and not connected with the campaign – where’s the social media integration with the AR?)
Though most of these components on their own aren’t mind blowing, it’s the sum of all the parts that makes the campaign a very integrated experience. However, one component that stands out is the Mosaic Collective as it holds the most promise to make the weekly viewing of Flash Forward a more personal experience.
(VERY SMALL SPOILER ALERT BELOW)
In the series, the FBI has setup a site where people can post their Flash Forwards with the hope that the FBI can then start to link clues together through people that are common to each Flash Forward. The Mosaic Collective site functions in the same way allowing people to sign up and upload information. On the surface, this is standard UGC content being uploaded to the site but the various methods of connecting content (through data visualization) is engaging and worth checking out. This is also where there could be a potential tie-in to the show with UGC content slowly being integrated into the show through essential storylines or secondary characters. This is obviously difficult to pull off but it would help break the boundaries between how these entertainment support sites interact with their viewers by taking the reality and integrating it with the fantasy.
The overall campaign borrows quite a bit from Lost, but that is a good thing as Flash Forward is targeting the same fanbase. I’m hoping this campaign evolves some more especially with the Mosaic Collective. It’s definitely worth checking out though to see how interactive can be leveraged to create a compelling integrated interactive campaign and enhanced story driven experience.
Video technology continues to evolve allowing often surreal footage to be shot (in this case via a helmet-cam.) This is a video making the rounds of a skier caught in an avalanche. Luckily he survived but only after being buried under the packed snow for a few excruciating minutes…
You really do see something new everyday on the Internet…
As we’ve discussed inthepast, YouTube’s Annotation feature allows you to turn normal YouTube videos Interactive to create Choose Your Own Adventure Stories (CYOA), Trivia Games, and so on. Over the last few months, we’ve seen major brands starting to embrace the CYOA format so we felt it might be worth listing a few recent efforts that are using annotated interactive video to great effect. We’ve also listed one effort that needs some work.
In no particular order…
The U.K. Knife Adventure
Created as a PSA to educated youths on the dangers of knife crime in the U.K., this CYOA campaign uses Annotations to create an interactive experience showing the results of different paths you choose. The key to this campaign working is the well done production values that make the experience very life-like.
Sony Ericsson – W995 Interactive Product Demonstration
This interactive CYOA product demonstration for the W995 is in German but it’s well produced and it’s very clear that it was created specifically for YouTube and Annotation interactivity.
Universal – Don’t Miss A Beat II Music Trivia Challenge
Using annotations on videos allows for interactive programs like Music Trivia Challenges and Universal has done a great job promoting their artists’ videos using this particular method. You can view the Don’t Miss A Beat II Music Video Challenge on Universal / Interscope’s Main YouTube Page.
Norton Antivirus
I’m including this example in the hopes of pointing out a few things that you need to be careful of when producing Annotated Interactive Video. For starters, you should allow enough time for the YouTube consumer to realize that they are in fact being asked to click on the video to choose a path. It’s critical that you highlight your annotations and keep the annotations present for at least 12-15 seconds. This will give your end viewer enough time (hopefully) to figure out that they should click on the video. The other thing I wanted to point out about this video is that it feels as if it was shot for broadcast and then as an afterthought, put on YouTube with annotations. It doesn’t have the feel of an actual CYOA video but at least the effort is there. You can view the CYOA videos on Norton’s YouTube Page.
We Are Organized Chaos (WAOC) is Zugara’s (www.zugara.com) interactive marketing and advertising blog where we’ll be featuring some great projects and discussing upcoming trends in the digital world. Work — good and bad — will be critiqued. Hope you’ll enjoy reading our insights and thoughts on interactive.
